Tuesday, April 29, 2008

Giving Keropok a Bad Name

image

From the Star Opinion

I AM from Kuala Terengganu and have been eating keropok losong from young. True, it is a family business, passed down from one generation to the next. True, the quality of the delicacy fluctuates.

These days there is less fish meat in losong keropok. Many keropok manufacturers add more sago and use fish flavouring instead.

The species of fish originally used has been substituted with low grade fishes.

Notice how your keropok lekor swells up in the frying pan but shrivels minutes after reaching your plate? The secret of keropok lekor that does not shrivel once it is out of the pan: better quality fish, and higher fish content. In short, high protein content. This is a rarity these days.

I am not complaining about the quality of keropok lekor sold in Terengganu. These people have a right to what they’re doing, being the second poorest state in Malaysia.

However, my concern is the keropok lekor sold in Kuala Lumpur that is passed off as keropok losong. It does not in any way resemble the real deal physically. How can it claim to taste like the real thing?

These imitations are giving the Terengganu keropok industry a bad name. I once asked a keropok seller in Sungei Besi, Kuala Lumpur, where his keropok was from and he didn’t know. Some had the cheek to hang up “Keropok lekor Terengganu asli” labels at their stalls.

Back in the 1980s, my aunt sold keropok sent from Kuantan, in Shah Alam. These sago and fish flavoured concoctions would literally turn to stone if not consumed within 30 minutes of frying. Her husband had chipped many a tooth consuming the unsold keropok during his 10 years of selling the poor imitation.

I wouldn’t categorise his keropok as food; they looked more like weapons a hobbit would carry.

I urge the Terengganu state government to do something to ensure that imitations are not passed off for the real thing.

Please, keropok is our heritage. Don’t, because of money-hungry individuals, let our heritage be ruined by F-grade keropok. - WMR

Other Links

Terengganu to replant abandoned paddy fields :)

Sunday, April 27, 2008

The Book of the Uncommon

Thanks Steven for his witty comment on KarYong's post

The rites for Speakers without a sermon

1. Host announce speaker;

2. Speaker jumps up enthusiastically to the pulpit and before straightening yourself, shout to the congregation: All the time? (Speaker puts right hand behind right ears)

3. Congregation replies, God is good

4. Speaker, ask again, louder and firmer, God is good (right hand behind right ear)?

5. Congregation: All the time.

6. Speaker, right hand down, palm at waist level, keep waiving upwards, shouts to the Congregation: Can I hear an Amen!?

7. Same action of the right waiving hands, Speaker shouts to the congregation (now speaker must be a bit jumpy), Can I hear a Alleluia!?

8. Speaker, calms down a bit and straightened himself, says: Its great to be in God's House! When Jesus was small, where did Joseph and Mary found him? He was in God's House! That's right Church, turn to your neighbours and go you tell him: You are at the right place Buddy.

9. Speaker raise his right hand lower his head, stressed his eyebrows and begin to mumble a few inteligible words and then burst out in prayers of thanksgiving for everything.

10. Speaker look back at the congregation and says, Church, it's always good to come to church to hear SERMONS, but today, we don't want any of those, WE WANT GOD'S WORDS. Now say to your neighbours, WE WANT GOD'S WORDS!

11. Speaker: The Spirit told me this morning, "THOU SHALT NOT PREACH LIKE THE OTHER LEADERS FOR I HAVE PREPARED THOU TO SPEAK MY WORDS, NOT THE WORDS OF COMMENTARIES, NOT THE WORDS OF THEOLOGIANS". Yes, we are gonna hear god's word today Church. Can I hear a Alleluia?! (right hand behind ears)

12. What's god's word!? God says he wanna heal you! God knows you are in trouble. SERMONS TEACH YOU TO DO THIS AND THAT, BUT GOD'S WORDS TEACH YOU WHAT GOD IS DOING! Amen!?

13. I sense a need, yes, there is a need, a pain - this sister is right here among us and god is speaking to you about ur pain in the family. You are burdened with this unhappiness. God wants to heal YOU! Come sister, open yourself to god (Speaker wait for ppl to come in front. And repeat the above, substituting "pain" with "disease" or "financial difficulties" until the front of the church is filled with ppl.

14. Finally, Speaker make a general call. COME CHURCH, the rest of you, come because I AM NOT GONNA SPEAK. GOD WILL BE SPEAKING TO YOU DIRECTLY. ALLLELUIA, everyone come and raise ur hands, talk to god, shout to him, cry out to him! PRAISE GOD, ALLELUIA!

15. Speaker jumps down and invite church leaders to come in front and pray for each of the persons.

16. Speaker said a concluding prayer after slaining about 10 folks. And go home quickly, get books out and start REALLY prepare for next speaking engagement.

Steven Sim

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Hokkien Food : A Humble Heritage

By ALICE YONG
Pictures by BONNIE YAP

The Hokkiens are the largest Chinese dialect group that migrated to the Nanyang (South-East Asia) area in the 19th century. Most of them came from the Fujian province on the southeastern shore of China.

image

According to renowned Shanghainese author Lynn Pan, in her book Sons of the Yellow Emperor, the coastal Fujian province is about the size of England, predominantly mountainous with limited land for agriculture. Although the area is home to some of the finest Chinese teas, life was hard and its harvests so terribly unpredictable that the province was struck by famine time and again.

However, its coast was dotted with many islands, creating well-sheltered harbours for Fuzhou (Hokchew), Quanzhou (Chuanchew) and Xiamen (Amoy) that later developed into trading ports. Hokkien sailors were reputedly some of the best in China, as sea travel became the main mode of transport to other parts of the country. When the wind was right, it only took three days to reach the Philippines by junk.

Later, more and more Hokkiens ventured to other parts of South-East Asia such as Singapore, Malaya, Indonesia and Siam, in a bid to escape the difficult times back home. They were lured by the promise of better opportunities in the Nanyang area.

The difficult living conditions in the recent past have taught the Hokkiens to be frugal and thrifty, hence giving rise to the popular notion of them being kiam siap (stingy)! Food is never wasted and any extra supply of fish, eggs and vegetables would be carefully preserved or pickled, and kept for consumption during winter months or when food was scarce.

This is probably one of the reasons why older generations of Hokkiens have been known to consume vast quantities of kiam chai (salted vegetables), kiam hu (salted fish), chai poh (pickled radish) and other assorted pickles and preserved vegetables.

The province is famed for its noodles and robust pork dishes. Pork is popular, basically because the pig symbolises good luck, fertility and virility. These hardy and versatile animals – due to the scarcity of land, are easy to raise (most are fed kitchen scraps) – provide fertiliser for the fields and can be slaughtered for food during feast days. Famous Hokkien pork dishes include Hong Bak (braised pork in black soy sauce) and Bak Kut Teh, stewed pork in a herbal broth which is served with rice.

But rather than displaying original provincial tastes, the two dishes are local Hokkien developments from the Hokkien strongholds of Penang and Klang. Bak Kut Teh (BKT), recognised as a Hokkien food in Malaysia, originated in Klang, a port town where BKT is the breakfast staple.

Fujian is also famed for its popiah, a fresh roll filled with shredded vegetables. The term popiah in the dialect means a ''thin biscuit'', a reference to the floppy, paper-thin crepe used to wrap the filling into a roll.

Violet Oon, one of Singapore’s foremost food authorities, gives a recipe for Hokkien Poh Piah at the website http://food.asia1.com.sg/recipes/. Among the filling ingredients called for include yam bean, bamboo shoot, French bean, cabbage, shrimp, belly pork and garlic.

Most Hokkien dishes are simple and lacking in sophistication and lightness of flavour compared to other Chinese cuisines. According to Lee Yuh Shoo, the president of the Hokkien Association in Klang, the foods of the Hokkiens are simple and unembellished, prepared only for the practical purpose of filling the stomach. ''That is why you will not find Hokkien dishes served in restaurants,'' he said.

In his research paper published in the book, Changing Chinese Foodways in Asia, Tan Chee-beng wrote that while the Cantonese identity is adopted in Malaysian restaurant food, ''only at the level of hawker food is the Hokkien identity distinguised or assumed,'' although many restaurants may be operated by Hokkien people.

This is certainly the case in Penang, where many hawker food bears the Hokkien hallmarks and names: popiah, char kuey teow, char kuey kak (fried radish cake), Hokkien mee, mee hwoen kuey (a fresh flour soup noodle), lor bak, etc.

In The Heritage of Chinese Cooking by Australian Chinese culinary consultant and author, Elizabeth Chong, it was mentioned that Fujian soy sauce is said to be the best and richest which probably explains why the Hokkiens have such an affinity for this ubiquitous Chinese condiment. In fact, the first soy sauce and canning factory known as Amoy Canning was set up in Fujian in the year 1908.

Many Hokkien dishes are stained brown by the heavy use of soy sauce. The famous slippery Hokkien-style fried noodle, for example, is so dark it is referred to as ''black noodles''. The Hokkiens love noodle as it symbolises longevity.

When some of the early Hokkien traders settled down in the Straits Settlement of Singapore, Malacca and Penang, many of these men eventually married local women, resulting in the Straits-born Chinese or Peranakans, also known as the Babas (men) and Nonyas (women).

A unique cuisine evolved from the Peranakans, reflecting the marriage of the mostly Hokkien immigrants to the local Malays. This union has left its indelible stamp on Nonya dishes and vice versa. The Penang Nonyas speak the Hokkien dialect and many of their dishes bear Hokkien names such as jiu hu char (stir-fried shredded cuttlefish with yam bean), kiam chai ark (salted vegetable and duck soup), hee peow th’ng (fish maw soup) and sambal heh bee (dried shrimp sambal).

Through intermingling, some of these dishes found their way into Hokkien homes. Having developed a taste for chilli, the Penang Hokkiens adopted spice into their diet. Hence you find a spicy Hokkien noodles on the streets of Penang.

As a Peranakan Hokkien who married into another Hokkien family, Mrs Yong Eng Swee explained that noodle dishes such as Hokkien mee is a ''must have'' dish for major Chinese festivals like the lunar New Year while mee sua is served to commemorate birthdays and when one needs a change of luck. ''The Hokkiens will always serve mee sua with a pair of hard boiled eggs to denote good things come in pairs.

''Certain Hokkien dishes are no longer popular today,'' she notes. ''For instance, hong bak was usually eaten with ki ah kueh, a type of traditional steamed rice cake favoured by Hokkiens. The younger generations today have no inkling what this is.''

Mrs Yong recalls that jiu hu char was originally prepared using bamboo shoots, dried cuttlefish, dried shrimps and belly pork. ''This laborious dish required one to soak the bamboo shoots in several changes of rice water to get rid of the pungent smell before being cut into fine strips by hand,'' she said.

''Due to the scarcity and costliness of bamboo shoots, people began substituting it with sengkuang or yam bean that is more readily available and cheaper.''

  • Ang Koo
  • Savoury Glutinous Rice (Chu Bee P'ng)
  • Hong Bak (Braised Pork in Thick Black Sauce)
  • Sweet Rice Cakes (Huat Kueh)
  • Char Liap Liap (Stir-fried bean curd with preserved radish and long beans)
  • Hokkien Mee
  • Char Kuih Kak (Pan-fried Radish Cake)
  • Jiu Hu Char (Stir-fried Shredded Sengkuang and Dried Cuttlefish)
  • Penang Hokkien Prawn Mee
  • Mee Suah (Flour Vermicelli in Soup)
  • Thursday, April 24, 2008

    Letter to the President

    "As evangelical Christians, we embrace the biblical promise to Abraham: "I will bless those who bless you." (Genesis 12:3). And precisely as evangelical Christians committed to the full teaching of the Scriptures, we know that blessing and loving people (including Jews and the present State of Israel) does not mean withholding criticism when it is warranted. Genuine love and genuine blessing means acting in ways that promote the genuine and long-term well being of our neighbors. Perhaps the best way we can bless Israel is to encourage her to remember, as she deals with her neighbor Palestinians, the profound teaching on justice that the Hebrew prophets proclaimed so forcefully as an inestimably precious gift to the whole world.

    Historical honesty compels us to recognize that both Israelis and Palestinians have legitimate rights stretching back for millennia to the lands of Israel/Palestine. Both Israelis and Palestinians have committed violence and injustice against each other. The only way to bring the tragic cycle of violence to an end is for Israelis and Palestinians to negotiate a just, lasting agreement that guarantees both sides viable, independent, secure states.

    To achieve that goal, both sides must give up some of their competing, incompatible claims. Israelis and Palestinians must both accept each other's right to exist. And to achieve that goal, the U.S. must provide robust leadership within the Quartet to reconstitute the Middle East roadmap, whose full implementation would guarantee the security of the State of Israel and the viability of a Palestinian State. We affirm the new role of former Prime Minister Tony Blair and pray that the conference you plan for this fall will be a success.

    Mr. President, we renew our prayers and support for your leadership to help bring peace to Jerusalem, and justice and peace for all the people in the Holy Land."

    -- Lettter to President Bush, published in the New York Times
    Further Reading

    Tuesday, April 22, 2008

    Sunday, April 20, 2008

    Kristus di Kancah Peradaban

    Mengapakah kita sering dibuat keliru oleh pertanyaan-pertanyaan yang diajukan dunia terhadap iman Kristian? Mengapa bukan sebaliknya?

    Mengapa bukan kita yang mendorong dunia untuk memikirkan secara serius, visi alkitabiah sebagai harapan kepada pelbagai krisis rumit yang kita hadapi pada zaman ini?

    Di manakah peranan kita dalam kancah peradaban dunia? Apakah relevannya penebusan Kristus dengan dinamik yang terjadi dalam dunia Akademia?

    Bagaimanakah orang Kristian seharusnya memakai anugerah kemampuan berfikir yang diciptakan Tuhan ini?

    Renungilah di Cahaya Nusantara

    Thursday, April 17, 2008

    Fitna : An Australian Christian Response

    Richard Schumack wrote this piece, questioning the truthfulness and validity of the portrayals in the movie. He also raised some questions like, "Does the Qur’an indeed promote violence in the name of Islam?" as portrayed by Geert Wilders?

    He also mentioned briefly about how the task of interpreting some difficult verses like 47:4 has been something of which the Muslim world grapples with. Ibn Kathir explained the verse not as an injunction to everyday violence, but rather a verse rooted in the military context of the Battle of Badr.

    For we cannot read the first part of 47:4,

    "If you encounter (in war) those who disbelieve, you may strike the necks...",

    without considering the overall context of the subsequent part

    "...If you take them as captives you may set them free or ransom them, until the war ends. Had GOD willed, He could have granted you victory, without war..."

    Schumack also raised some other interpretive issues as well,

    Is this Qur’anic injunction situational in application? Is this verse tempered by other teaching? Has it been ‘abrogated’ by other verses?  Is it metaphorical or symbolic? Are the interpretations taken by teachers in the movie representative of the Muslim scholarly community?

    At the end, he advised non-Muslims

    For the non-Muslim encountering any anti-Islamic polemic such as Fitna, it is important to be slow to adopt the rhetoric without first questioning your understanding of Islam and the Qur’an.

    Ask whether an "Islamist" reading of the Qur’an is authentic. Pick up a Qur’an and read it for yourself. Ask your Muslim neighbour how they read these verses in the Qur’an.

    Importantly, don’t judge Islam by its worst advocates. Comparing the worst evil perpetrated in the name of Islam with the best good done in the name of Christ (or vice versa) achieves nothing.

    The argument of Fitna must be established or dismissed by the Qur’an.

    May peace and goodwill  be with us all.

    Wednesday, April 09, 2008

    A Crossless Messiah?



    Buffet Mentality?



    Liow: Open forum to discuss health scheme

    By AUDREY EDWARDS

    PUTRAJAYA: The Health Ministry is keen to have a public debate on the National Health Financing Scheme.

    Minister Datuk Liow Tiong Lai said a public forum would be the “best way” to address issues and problems on the implementation of the scheme.

    “I would like to have a public debate. Let us talk about it,” Liow said in an interview on Monday.

    “This is something which will help the people and the Government have better health services in the country.”

    When the idea was first mooted 25 years ago, certain parties raised concerns about how the scheme would be implemented.

    The proposals included having it modelled after the EPF and Socso schemes where “eligible” employees make monthly payments through a deduction from their salary and both the scheme and the National Health Financing Authority overseeing it would be non-profit and not privatised.

    Former Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Chua Soi Lek announced in 2004 that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi had given approval and the “general principles” had been agreed upon.

    Consultants were also appointed to look into the details of the mechanism and there were even calls for a Royal Commission to be set up to get broad feedback before it was introduced.

    Liow admitted that it was not going to be easy for the Government to have such a scheme because it might not be a popular decision.

    However, he said the Government “did not have much choice” where the present system has left it subsidising almost 98% of healthcare in the country.

    He, however, said it would take about three to four years before the scheme could be implemented.

    A plus point of having the scheme was that the people would be able to get treatment either in the private or public sector where the Government would be able to use all existing doctors instead of the current system, he said.

    “One way to solve this problem is to have an insurance scheme. It does not matter whether you go to the government or the private sector. The doctor will treat you and the insurance will pay,” he said.

    A minus point, however, would be the risk of the government or insurance company going bankrupt because the public had developed a “buffet mentality”.

    Asked who was likely to take charge of the scheme, he said it did not matter because the most important thing was for the people to enjoy the benefits.

    Sunday, April 06, 2008

    Church Mice